Zhiyuan "plagiarism door" the latest notification: 2 plagiarism 4 citation irregularities, the relevant responsible persons have taken the initiative to leave

Carlini's experience in discovering this situation was quite dramatic: one of his co-authors wanted to see what was worth learning from the article, but the more he looked at some parts, the stranger they became, and finally found that some paragraphs of the paper were directly copied from their own article.

Through preliminary verification of the data collected, Carlini found that the paper was also suspected of plagiarizing more than a dozen papers from other authors.

After Carlini exposed the suspected plagiarism in this article, it soon attracted widespread attention both at home and abroad.

Some netizens believe that this was written by a team of students, who may not be clear enough about academic standards, while most of the others are just titling.

There are also people who share the academic misconduct they have encountered.

A suspected author of the paper in question broke the news that the time left for him to write the paper was very tight, only a week or so, and he guessed that the time left for the students might be even less, so there was a situation where a large section was copied.

To solve the problem, authors should be given more time and more opportunities.

As the story unfolded, Wise Source was quick to respond.

On April 13, JiYuan issued a letter of apology for the "A Roadmap for Big Model" review; two days later, it announced the establishment of an investigation team to conduct an independent investigation into the paper in question.

On July 15, Zhiyuan officially informed the investigation results.

The newest version of the "plagiarism door" is a new version of the "plagiarism door".

Carlini, who initially reported the alleged plagiarism in JiYuan's paper, later said that the article received much more attention than he expected, so he asked people not to turn it into a "witch hunt".

Carlini objected to the suggestion that "everyone involved in such incidents should be fired immediately, banned from the arXiv, etc." and urged everyone not to be too critical of the authors of the article, but to focus more on the morale of the academic field as a whole.